Skip to main content

Management issue may upset IFCI sale again

MUMBAI: Lack of clarity on management control may once again dampen interest among investors who are seeking to bid for the strategic stake in IFCI. On May 29, the board of IFCI announced that it would be making a second attempt to sell 26% in the term-lending institution. Market observers say this time IFCI will be able to pull through the stake sale only if it is willing to give management control to the investors.

Less than six months ago, IFCI was forced to call off its plans to sell stake after talks with Sterlite and Morgan Stanley — the consortium selected among bidders — failed. The bone of contention then was that of management control. Banking analysts say with the slump in the stock market and the perceived slowdown in the economy, few investors may show interest in bidding.

"This makes it even more essential for the institution to being in clarity on what is in it for investors," said an analyst. Last time, IFCI had the advantage of calling for bids amid the boom in the stock market. While it had received ten bids, most bidders pulled out of race mid-way due to lack of clarity.

Market observers say IFCI will have to clearly spell out what they expect from the investors and what they have to offer to win suitable candidates as bidders. One development that irked investors was that after inviting bids but before shortlisting the final bidder, IFCI decided to allow PSU banks and insurance companies to convert IFCI bonds worth Rs 1,479 crore into shares. In effect, this would enhance the equity base and post-conversion, lower the stake of strategic investors below 26%.

Further, there was confusion on how much stake banks and insurance companies will hold post-conversion.
The last lap of bidding saw only three contenders in the fray — Sterlite Industries with Morgan Stanley, a consortium including Punjab National Bank, JC Flowers and Shinsei Bank and the third bidder were investors led by Cargill Financial Services.

Sources said investors were unhappy with the uncertainty over management control. After having acquired 26% stake, the successful buyer would have had to make an open offer for 20%, which would raise their stake to 46% — making them majority shareholder. But even at this position, they were not guaranteed full management control.

Yet another bone of contention was the bonds worth Rs 923 crore held by the government. There is uncertainty on whether or not they would be converted into shares. A conversion of government stake would widen the equity base and bring down the stake held by the strategic investor.

On June 12, the board of IFCI will meet to consider issues related to conversion of government's Rs 923 crore debt into shares and induction of strategic partner. This time, IFCI's CEO Atul Kumar Rai has been quoted by the media saying "IFCI will not repeat the mistakes of the past," which is being interpreted to mean that the management skills of the new partner would be better leveraged or that they may be offered management control. Banking analyst say if IFCI fails to pull through this time, it faces the risk of losing some credibility

Popular posts from this blog

Bio-fuel has top investors powered up

23RD ,JUNE India's fortune-hunters believe their new-found love for biofuel will pay off. India's well-known investors who are known for their Midas touch have spotted an opportunity in bio-fuel, betting big on ethanol, bio-mass and even bio-fuel equipment makers in India and other parts of the globe. Billionaires Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, C Sivasankaran, Vinod Khosla, founder of Sun Microsystems, and Nemish Shah, the media-shy joint partner of Enam Financial Services, are investing in bio-fuel makers quietly, expecting that bio-fuel will have a big play in the coming years as the world looks for a viable alternative to the fast depleting oil reserves. Jhunjhunwala, who is known for his ability to spot a multi-bagger at a very early stage, recently invested in Hyderabad-based bio-fuel firm Nandan Biometrics.He is also a 10 per cent stakeholder in Praj Industries, which is a bio-fuel technology provider…

up to 8,500% return in 5 years! Investors made a killing in these 30 smallcap stocks

U By Rahul Oberoi, | Updated: Dec 01, 2017, 04.06 PM IST Post a Comment
Efficiency pays in the long run. Among the top smallcap plays on Dalal Street, 30 companies with stable return on equity (RoE) and return on capital employed (RoCE) have surged up to 8,500 per cent over the past five years.

All these companies had a debt-to-equity ratio of less than 1 and have been maintaining RoE and RoCE of over 20 per cent since 2012-13.

Avanti Feeds emerged the chart topper, with an 8,527 per cent gain to Rs 2,596.60 as of November 28 from Rs 30.10 ..

ovember 28 from Rs 30.10 on November 27, 2012. The company’s return on equity for FY17, FY16, FY15, FY14 and FY13 stood at 42.65 per cent, 46.21 per cent, 52.41 per cent, 45.79 per cent and 27.60 per cent, respectively. Avanti also managed to achieve a return on capital employed of over 50 per cent in last four years. Its RoCE stood at 28.59 per cent inRoE measures net income earned for every rupee of shareholder funds, while…

5 dark-horse picks

Kwadrat/ Kwadrat/
If you are a conservative investor, using the mutual fund route is the best way to invest in stocks. But if you are game for some excitement, you might want to dabble directly in stocks, especially small-cap stocks. Stocks that are smaller in size, in terms of market capitalisation, carry higher risk. The reasons are — one, lower traded volume increases price volatility, two, information is usually scarce on these companies, three, business risk is higher since many of these companies are dependent on a single product and four, governance risk is also higher in these stocks. That said, small-cap stocks have the capacity to deliver far greater returns when compared to large-cap stocks. Sample this: there were 16 stocks with market cap more than ₹50,000 crore in January 2009. These stocks delivered an average return of 138 per cent in the last eight years but 4 out of every 10 stocks in this group delivered negative returns. On the ot…